Would you trust a robot with your secrets? Find out why Meta AI might know more about you than your best friend.

1. Why does this conversation matter — and to whom?

Imagine telling something intimate to a friend, only to find out later that they passed the information on to a large database, where it will be analyzed by thousands of engineers. The integration of Meta AI into Brazil's most popular apps (WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook) creates precisely this paradox: the company asks users “not to share secrets” while simultaneously encouraging the experimentation of an assistant capable of answering any question in seconds.

For the lay public, this technical “small detail” — the absence of end-to-end encryption in conversations with the AI — is not obvious. However, it is the inflection point between a fun experience and a real risk of data exposure. Our goal, therefore, is to explain in accessible language:

how Meta AI collects information,
why it may jeopardize your privacy,
what measures the ANPD has already taken,
and, most importantly, what simple steps you can take to protect yourself.

2. What does Meta AI know about you?

The promise of Meta AI is to generate contextualized responses, jokes, summaries, or on-demand images. To do this, it analyzes every word the user types. This processing occurs on Meta's servers, where the conversation is stored and serves as fuel for training the language model. Unlike traditional WhatsApp chats, there is no end-to-end encryption in this route.

In addition to written content, the company admits collecting:

Public data on your networks (open posts, comments, likes),
Device metadata (phone model, app version, approximate location),
Usage patterns that reveal habits, interests, and even emotional state.

The official policy promises anonymization. Still, combinations between conversations and public profiles can re-identify individuals with relative ease, as expert reports point out.

3. Risk map: what can go wrong?

The table below summarizes the main threat vectors surrounding Meta AI and contrasts the AI experience with conventional chats:

Risk Category	Standard Chat (WhatsApp)	Integrated Meta AI	Potential Impact
End-to-end encryption	Yes	No	High
Collection for AI Training	No	Yes	High
Opt-out option	Irrelevant	Partial/hidden	Medium
Transparency of terms	Clear	Complex	High
Protection for minors	LGPD Standard	Questionable	High
Internal access for moderation	Limited	Extensive	Medium

Note that the points in red (high impact) are precisely focused on what the average user does not see: encryption and transparency.

4. Does the warning “don’t share your secrets” solve it?

The message conveyed by Meta initially sounds like a gesture of honesty. In practice, it shifts the responsibility of protection to the user. If the company really didn’t want sensitive data to reach the training database, it could:

Enable end-to-end encryption for conversations with the AI,
Adopt opt-in consent (the user chooses to participate, not the other way around),
Simplify the settings panel, allowing blocking collection in two clicks.

Until these improvements arrive, the best remedy remains conscious self-censorship — avoiding including any confidential details in the conversation with the bot.

5. ANPD’s response: real-time regulation

In July 2024, the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) ordered the suspension of using Brazilians' information to train Meta AI. The agency classified the company's policy as “high risk” and criticized the difficulty of opposing data treatment, especially for children and teenagers.

After adjustments and negotiations, clearance was only granted under three conditions:

Clearer privacy texts and in simple Portuguese,
Direct route within the app to deny participation,
Periodic impact reports, auditable by the ANPD itself.

Even so, the AI landed in Brazil before reaching the European Union, reinforcing its nature as a “controlled experiment” on national soil. For users, the takeaway is: when regulators apply pressure, companies change — but the gap between collection and correction may already have compromised sensitive data.

6. Step by step: how to limit your exposure

Avoid complicated technical terms; think of three everyday gestures that anyone with a smartphone can perform.

Maintain absolute secrecy
Never reveal passwords, card numbers, banking details, or medical histories. It seems obvious, but internal tests show that some users still share passwords thinking the chat is “protected.”
Adjust the privacy center
Within WhatsApp, Instagram, or Facebook, look for “Off-Facebook Activity” or “AI Preferences.” Disable the “Allow use for AI training” option. The path changes with each update, but searching for “privacy” in the menu usually leads to the destination.
Limit personal requests
Use Meta AI for recipes, grammar corrections, or gift ideas, never for intimate dilemmas or family secrets. What seems innocent today may be cross-referenced with other data tomorrow.

Bonus tip: Prefer messengers that offer a "private" mode with native end-to-end encryption if you need to exchange sensitive information with someone you trust.

7. Between data and desires: the near future

The appeal of an assistant that understands colloquial Portuguese, generates memes, and even helps with homework is enormous. This means that even when warned, millions of Brazilians will continue talking to Meta AI. Unless there is structural change — encryption, genuine consent, and robust anonymization — the mass collection of conversations will likely increase the attack surface and the temptation for internal or external leaks.

Experts point out three trends for 2025:

Selective encryption: public pressure for major platforms to implement partial encryption in AI interactions.
Automated oversight: regulatory bodies are expected to adopt continuous auditing tools using AI to monitor AIs.
Digital education in schools: concepts of privacy and data protection are beginning to enter the elementary school curriculum, preparing the next generation to interact critically with virtual assistants.

8. Conclusion: the golden rule of confidentiality

Technology is neutral; we are the ones who decide the boundaries. Meta AI can be fun, useful, and even educational, but it does not replace human discernment. If the information is too valuable to fall into unknown hands, it should not be typed in a chat controlled by a big tech. As regulators tighten the net, companies adapt — still, nothing beats individual care and common sense.

So, take this maxim for your daily navigation: share less, question more, always configure.

Good conversation — and good filters!

Sources: